Dorset Ancestors Rotating Header Image

Stourpaine

Stourpaine

When Harold fell at Hastings in 1066 it was bad news for the Saxons throughout England. Over the following few years they saw their possessions sold, they were turned out of their manors and turfed off their land, which was then granted to the conquering Normans. The Saxon, Alward, owned the manor of Stures and he faired no better than the rest. The manor was situated at the foot of Hod Hill, where the Ewerne stream meets the river Stour. Twenty years on from the famous battle at Hastings it was granted to Humphrey the Chamberlain when, according to the Domesday Book, the combined population of Stures with the hamlets of Ashe and Lazerton was 28.

By 1135 the records show that Hilias de Oresculz held the manor and it was his son, Richard, who gave land and advowson in Stures to the Priory church of Christchurch in Twyneham. Richard’s daughter Matilda married William Fitzjohn and they had two sons and a daughter. One of their sons was named Payne and this son had a son named William Fitzpayne, who had three sons: Richard de Stures Payn, who became the first rector of the parish in 1291, and Nicholas who also became a priest, leaving the third son, Bartholomew, to inherit. By 1316 Bartholomew had been knighted and confirmed by the sheriff as Lord of Sture Payne and Edmondsham.

Records reveal that in 1311 John Payne sued Roger Spurnhare and William Nots 100s for trespass and damage. The particulars of the case were recorded in some detail but on the day appointed for the hearing the clerk entered the words “They did not come.” It appears this happened three times and when the case came up for the forth time a despairing clerk wrote “Similar entry as above.”
 
The following year there was a dispute between the Abbess of Tarrant Crawford and Bartholomew Payne over the possession of some meadow land and grazing rights after the hay had been harvested.  The court decided in favour of Bartholomew Payne and said the Abbess takes nothing, but is “In mercy for a false claim.” The Knight was back at court again that year when he sued several people for trespass and damages, but the record reveals a disregard for the court was becoming usual as the words “they did not come” again appears in the record. During the reign of Richard II (1377-1399), Stour Payne was granted to Edward Payne.

The last Payne died without an heir and in Edward IV’s reign (1461-1483) the lands were transferred to the Hussey family of Shapwick. In1645, during the Civil War, a farm belonging to Joseph Hussey, ensign to Col. Phillips, a Royalist, was sequestrated by Parliament; Joseph was buried at Stour Payne in 1685. Another Hussey, Robert, also chose a military career and he was an officer at the battle of Quebec in 1759 and fell alongside his commanding officer, General Wolfe. Some of the troops who took part in the battle of Quebec had been trained near to Stourpaine. (See our story about Iwerne Courtney.)  Robert had two sons, both named Hubert. The youngest son was buried here in 1742; a second son was baptised here in 1744 or 1745 and when still a young man went off to London.

In the 19th century the inhabitants were in the main agricultural workers earning low wages and living in ill-kept cottages housing large families who would typically occupy one small room.  Children were deprived of their education, kept away from school to work on allotments and knit clothes for sale. A lot of girls as young as ten and eleven were employed making gloves, all to bring in a little more money.  It was a miserable existence, as the Vicar of Stourpaine reported to the Poor Law Commissioners in 1867. It was noted that the behaviour of some women was a problem: “There are more bastard children (in Stourpaine) than in any other (Dorset) village,” a report concluded. 

In the Domesday Book a gift of land to the church is mentioned but there is nothing else to suggest there was a church here in Saxon times. In 1190, on the site of the present church, building work started and was completed in 1300. In the 15th century the tower was demolished and the present tower was built.
 
In 1858 the church had deteriorated and T.H. Wyatt undertook the construction of a new chancel and nave. He saved a few features from the original church including the 15th century west tower and a kneeling effigy of John Straight in black gown with gathered sleeves and tall collar; he was vicar here from 1650-1659. The original font was lost. The pulpit was carved by the vicar, Charles Sweet and four parishioners, between 1911 and 1914.

Lazerton was a separate parish, its church dedicated to St. Andrew. In the late 12th century a charter states it was so poor that it was released “from all payments except synodals.” The parish of Lazerton was not taxed in 1428 when it had fewer than ten inhabitants. In 1431 Lazerton was joined with Stourpaine because “the church at Lazerton had so small profits that it had been and was then destitute of a chaplain.” Lazerton was uninhabited when the 1662 Hearth Tax returns were made.  Today there is nothing to show of Lazerton; what did remain was destroyed in 1962.

Today the village is divided by the main Blandford to Shaftesbury road, on the one side of which is an estate of modern housing and on the other side cob and thatched cottages and the church. With the views to the vale of Blackmore and its proximity to Hod Hill with its ancient British fort it is not surprising that many ramblers and tourists come this way.

Stourpaine – The Village

The village of Stourpaine photographed from Hod Hill by Mike Searle. For more about the photographer click on the photograph.

The village of Stourpaine photographed from Hod Hill by Mike Searle. For more about the photographer click on the photograph.

Stourpaine – Holy Trinity Church

Holy Trinity Church Stourpaine by Chris Downer. For information about the photographer click on the photograph.

Holy Trinity Church Stourpaine by Chris Downer. For information about the photographer click on the photograph.

Robert Coward (1819-1905)

Born at Stourpaine into the Dorset rural community in the early part of the 19th century it is unlikely that as he grew up Robert Coward expected a great deal out of life. He was illegitimate, his mother died when he was just 11 years of age, by which time he was probably already labouring on the land and he had little or no formal education.

Robert’s mother, Repentance Coward, herself illegitimate and the daughter of Hannah Coward, was baptised at Holy Trinity church at Stourpaine on the 24th July 1785 and was buried there on the 17th January 1830, when it was recorded that she was 47 years of age. She never married but had two sons; Job, baptised 12th February 1815, he died in infancy and was buried on the 27th May 1817; also Robert, who was baptised on the 16th May 1819.

After his mother’s death in 1830 Robert was probably taken in by another branch of the Coward family living in Stourpaine or by his father and it is likely throughout this period he offered himself for work as an agricultural labourer.

On November 9th 1842 Robert, then 23 years of age, married Ann Allen. She was also from a poor Stourpaine family: the 1851 census has Ann’s parents and three of her siblings listed as paupers’ inmates of the Blandford workhouse.

When pulling together a family history a marriage certificate (after 1837) will often provide the missing links: it will confirm the ages of a couple, who their fathers were and the witness details can reinforce or dismiss ideas you might have about your ancestors’ relationships.

That is the case here. The fact that the couple and all three witnesses signed the marriage certificate with their mark tells us they were illiterate and had not benefited from a formal education. We learn that Robert Coward knew his father was Henry Horlock. One of the witnesses was Charlotte Horlock so it is reasonable to conclude that Robert was on good terms with his father and family. Interestingly, perhaps out of respect for his mother’s memory, he never changed to his father’s name. His great and great great grandfathers were also named Robert.

Children were late coming to this relationship but after five years of marriage in 1847 Robert and Ann had a daughter who they named Rhoda. She was baptised on the 2nd of May in that year. Everything we know about Robert to this point and subsequently learn about his later life leads to the conclusion that he was at heart a decent family man.

Early in 1848 disaster struck this poor family when Robert was caught poaching. We know of nothing to suggest this enterprise was for any purpose other than to put food on the table for his family. He, however, on being apprehended by the keeper would have straight away known he was in serious trouble and likely to be facing six months in jail with hard labour at the very least. Perhaps, it was the thought of being separated from his wife and baby daughter that prompted him to make a fight of it and to try to escape the clutches of the keeper. Failing, he found himself arrested and held in jail until his trial at the Dorchester Assizes on 11th of March 1848. He was charged with poaching and beating a keeper.

Dorchester Crown Court had a long reputation for handing down rough justice. In the 17th century the notorious Judge Jefferies let it be known at the start of the hearings against men involved in the Monmouth Rebellion that he was minded to be lenient: 74 men went to the gallows. Robert would have known about the seven men from Tolpuddle, like him all agricultural labourers, who had been transported to Australia on trumped up charges that they had formed a Trade Union. Later in 1856 Martha Brown was sentenced to death for defending herself against an ogre of a husband. She was publicly hanged in front of a crowd numbering thousands.

Robert would have faced his court appearance with much trepidation and without a doubt he was greatly worried for his wife, who he knew even if he was treated leniently faced a long period of having to provide for herself and their child on her own.

“The sentence of the court upon you is, that you be transported beyond the seas for a term of 7 years.” For Robert this dreadful punishment the worst he may have expected meant that once transported he would never return to England and it was unlikely he would ever see his wife and daughter again. He was just 27 years of age and he must have felt that his life was over. He left London aboard the ‘Adelaide’ on 17th August 1849 arriving in Sydney on Christmas Eve 1849.

It was surprising, but reinforces what we say earlier about his good character, that he secured his Ticket of Leave on 30th December 1849. This was incredibly quick and confirms that he must have been a model prisoner in England while waiting to sail and continued to be so on the voyage and on arrival in Australia. This did not mean he had his freedom but he was probably allowed to work for wages and live virtually free: he would not have been allowed to leave Australia until his sentence had been completed and he would have from time to time to appear before a local Justice. He may have been restricted in other ways such as the area he could work and live in and he may have been subject to a curfew.

He must have been more than a little relieved to have survived the voyage and found that his life was not after all going to be quite as bad as he had every reason to have expected it to be. But imagine his joy on learning that his wife and daughter had secured passage as assisted immigrants. Ann and Rhoda arrived in Australia on the 14th August 1851. They were not long separated their first child born in Australia in 1853 was another daughter Sara Martha.

The government needed colonists to settle in Australia but few went out and the government turned to convicts who had completed their sentences; they were offered the essentials of free land, tools, seed and livestock. These incentives meant that many accepted the offer and became landowners and farmers.

Sentence served, against all the odds family united, Robert and Ann would have seized this opportunity with both hands. They stayed in Australia and produced a further 10 children, five sons and five daughters.  When he died Robert Coward’s estate was one thousand six hundred and twenty seven pounds. This couple had managed to turn adversity to opportunity and they both enjoyed a long life. Ann died on the 24th November 1900 aged 78 years and Robert died 22nd January 1905 aged 88 years. They were living and farming in Maitland, NSW where they are buried.

Rhoda thrived and on the 25th January 1868 married William Gulliver a son of Dorset who arrived in Australia around 1849 aged 5 years. Rhoda and William went on to have eleven children and some of their descendants now live in New Zealand.

Footnote: Robert Coward’s mother, Repentance, worked as a button maker.  Her mother, Hannah Coward, was the daughter of Robert and Mary Coward and was baptised at Stourpaine 11th of February 1759 and was buried in the parish on 16th of March 1794 – a short life of just 35 years. As far as we can tell Repentance was her only child.

We have found that Robert Coward had been in trouble previously. At the time of the 1841 census he was in jail at Dorchester. There were two other members of the Coward family there as well: William (25) and James (70.)

Footnote (2) It appears that Robert Coward had an older brother, Charles. His mother Repentance Coward had him baptised at Stourpaine on the 24th of February 1811. According to information supplied by Andrew Cooper who is a direct descendant of Charles Coward, it seems both brothers were involved in the 1848 affray.