Dorset Ancestors Rotating Header Image

Sir John and the House of Trenchard

In the parish church of Bloxworth near Bere Regis in east Dorset, visitors can see a memorial in white marble mounted high on the wall of a side chapel. The plaque is in memory of one of Stuart England’s most accomplished and controversial aristocratic statesmen or “principal secretary of state for life”; a figure as true to the soil of Dorset as Barnes or Hardy.

This colourful character was Sir John Trenchard. Trenchard was born in Lychett Matravers in March 1649, where his family had long held a manor, though from the late 15th century onwards the family seat was at Wolferton (or Wolveton) House. This house, near Charminster, had its foundations laid around 1480 by an earlier John Trenchard and his son Thomas, who in turn had inherited the estate through John’s marriage. Wolveton was originally conceived as a grand early Tudor mansion with Elizabethan additions, but was later largely demolished, and the present house is only the south west wing of the earlier one.

Thomas’s son, Sir George, had a daughter called Grace, who married into another of Dorset’s manorial families, the Strangways (Strangeways). Apart from his contribution to the building of Wolveton, Sir Thomas also embellished the 12th century church of St.Mary at Charminster by adding its imposing west tower. He also held office as Sheriff of Somerset and Dorset in 1509 and 1523, but is probably best known for hosting Archduke Phillip of Austria and his wife Juana (Joanna) at Wolveton after they were shipwrecked off the Dorset coast in the great storm of 1506. The story then follows that Thomas recruited a kinsman, John Russell, to act as his interpreter as he could not speak Spanish. James I in 1613 knighted Thomas.

Sir Thomas had a son – also called Thomas – born in 1615, who became the father of the later Sir John of Lytchett. The Trenchards were a family of longstanding puritan and parliamentary leanings. Two cousins, William Sydenham and John Sadler, were both soldiers and administrators in the service of Cromwell, and as he grew up John came to detest the unprincipled court life of Charles II. From the age of 15 to 18 John attended New College Oxford without obtaining a degree and went on to study law at the Middle Temple. Here he met up with Hugh Speke, a distant relative and son of Sir George Speke of White Lackington. (Sir George Trenchard’s wife was Ann Speke).

In association with his cousins John joined the Blue Riband Club, a society of agitators meeting at the King’s Head Tavern in Fleet Street. Although there was never any evidence of his being involved in Titus Oates’ famous popish plot, Trenchard would certainly have been an anti-papal sympathiser. When he was 30 in 1679, John entered Parliament to represent Taunton, and joined those who wished to bar the Duke of York from the throne. He attended meetings held by the dissidents, who were concerned that the Duke would attempt to restore Catholic prominence in England. In 1682 Trenchard married Hugh Speke’s sister Phillipa, then 18.

In 1683 some dissidents hatched a conspiracy to murder the King and his brother in Hertfordshire as they returned from the races at Newmarket. The Rye House Plot, as this conspiracy came to be known went wrong, casting suspicion on Trenchard and his cronies. Together with Lord Russell and Algernon Sydney he was arrested and sent to the Tower. (Interestingly, he was later able to recover his own arrest warrant, now in the archive of the Dorset County Record Office in Dorchester). Russell and Sydney were subsequently executed, but Trenchard appears to have turned his coat with sufficient alacrity to escape the same fate by possibly agreeing to pose as a double agent supplying the government with intelligence about anti-Stuart sedition in the west country!

As no concrete evidence could be levelled against him, Trenchard was released. While John was staying with his father-in-law at Illminster in 1685, the Duke of Monmouth landed in Lyme Bay to raise his notorious rebellion against the King in support of his claim to the English crown. With the suspected assistance of George Speke, John was compelled to escape back to the manor at Lytchett while it was still under surveillance by law officers. His servants then made arrangements to get him aboard a ship berthed at Weymouth. Trenchard then spent two years of exile in Holland; George Speke also fled the country. (Visit Archived Articles Section and click on ‘The Monmouth Rebellion’ Pub.August 2002. Ed.)

Meanwhile Hugh Speke, by then John’s brother-in-law, had been jailed for writing anti-Stuart pamphlets. Officers of the King also raided the Speke home and arrested Hugh’s brother Charles, who was summarily executed by hanging from a tree in Illminster market place. The King’s officers were in no doubt about where the family’s loyalties lay. During a tour by Monmouth of the West Country in 1681, George Speke had entertained the Duke and pledged his support for any future claim to the throne the Duke may assert.

During his two years of exile in the Netherlands Trenchard had made the acquaintance of William of Orange, the Protestant son-in-law of James II. It is believed that on his release from prison, Hugh also fled to Holland. However, in 1686 a general amnesty was issued for the exiles, largely brought about by the intervention of the Quaker William Penn, though Trenchard himself was not pardoned. Yet by the end of 1687 he was back in Dorset, probably as a consequence of offering service to the King in return for his liberty.

With the immediate danger over, Trenchard was able by 1688 to resume his parliamentary career. That year he was elected to represent Dorchester as the leading Whig (i.e. the gentry-party opposed to the Tories of the Court). In this capacity he made an unsuccessful bid to persuade King James II to tone-down his pro-catholic sympathies for the sake of the country’s peace. But the birth of a son to James that year threatened a papal succession once again. The Whigs and Tories united to invite William and Mary to claim the throne. Trenchard of course easily slipped into favour with the royal couple, although he took no active part in the revolution, which ousted James.

John Trenchard was knighted in 1689 and made Chief Justice of Chester. The following year he was elected member for Poole and appointed Secretary of State in 1692. In this capacity he adopted a distinctly draconian approach to the country’s security, setting up an elaborate spy network to oversee the exiled King James, then under the protection of Louis XIV. In the archives of the Bastille were letters revealing that Trenchard had very high level contacts in the French Court and that he had spies in the French channel ports who relayed information from French naval officers.

At home Trenchard was no less zealous in his anti-papal purges. He courted great unpopularity by persecuting those he thought to hold Jacobite sympathies and freely issued search warrants for their homes. Once, when on the trail of a bogus plot perpetuated by one Francis Taffe, Trenchard was much reviled for his gullibility, though he was a man impervious to criticism.

By spring 1695 Sir John Trenchard was in poor-health, and by the end of April he was dead. He was just 46 years old. Phillipa however was not widowed for long, marrying soon after a merchant named Daniel Sadler and living for almost another 50 years. By Phillipa, Trenchard had seven children. His three daughters, Elizabeth, Mary and Anne all married well, though only one of his four sons survived to adulthood.

It should be noted that there were John and Thomas Trenchards in two other possible branches of the family, which could lead to considerable confusion about who is meant. For example there was also a John Trenchard of Warmwell (1586-1662), and a literary John Trenchard (1662-1723), the author of ‘A Short History of Standing Arms in England’ (1698 & 1731) and ‘The Natural History of Superstition’ (1709).

Footnote:
Thomas Gerard in his book Coker’s Survey of Dorestshire (1732) wrote: “Bradford Peverll. The Seate for a longe time of the antient Familie of Peverells whose estate about Henry the Eighth’s time fell by a Female Heire to Nicholas Meggs and his Posteritie enjoy it. Neare Bradford the River dividing itself, making an Island of manie faire and fruitful Maedowes, and there joineth againe a little belowe Dorchester, the more northern branch, being the lesser, amongst these Maedoes runneth by Wolton, more trulie Wolvehampton, a fine and rich Seate which (by the daughter and Heire of John Jordan the antient owner of it) came to John Mohune. His only daughter and Heire Alice brought a faire Estate unto her husband Henry Trinchard of Hampshire whose Grandchilde Sir Thomas Trinchard, gracious with King Henry the Eighth was called chief Builder of the Habitation of Sir George Trinchard, a Man of Great Courage.” (See our article: ‘ Thomas Gerard of Trent’ Published 17th July 2011, in the Trent category.)

James R. Zelley 1877-1910

The day of January 15, 1910 was just another day for the crew of the pilot cutter “Spirit” and the Master T. Bennett in the Weymouth Harbour. As time ticked away, the day would end in tragedy for James Richard Zelley.

He was lost when the Danish steamer “St.Jans” crashed into the cutter. The Master T. Bennett and crew members J. Bennett and W. Tizzard survived the crash, but Zelley was lost and never recovered.

James was born in Weymouth, Dorset in 1877 to Thomas Richard Zelley and Mary Symes. He married Mary Emily Longman in 1904. He is also a grandson to Weymouth’s Richard Zelley – Mary Ann White.

Ten years earlier, James lost his Uncle William John Simpson Zelley in the Nanaimo, BC, Canada area on Sunday, February 11, 1900. Zelley the Weymouth born mariner and two friends former Nanaimo council member Richard Kenyon and John Cordell were duck hunting in Zelley’s sailboat when they were caught in a storm. Of interest, the name of one of the search party members that helped recover the remains from the Nanaimo River tide flats was a Harry Bennett.

There is a photograph of James R. Zelley in the gallery.

Bloxworth

Nowadays there are only a few cottages in Bloxworth fighting to be seen amongst the modern housing developments that were causing controversy as long as forty years ago, when Nikolaus Pevsner speaking of Bloxworth complained: “Many of the red brick cottages are derelict, or have already been demolished, and new housing south and west of the church includes some unpleasing showy abodes of Bournemouth commuters.”  But it has not always been such. In 1939 Arthur Mee spoke of Bloxworth as being: “as pretty a village as an artist could wish to see, with its thatched cottages scattered among the trees…” and in 1906 Frederick Treves called it: “..the daintiest hamlet…”.

The parish covers a little over 2,800 acres in a narrow strip of land about five miles North, North West of Wareham; it is a wooded area stretching across the northern edge of the south Dorset Heath and bordered by Morden and Bere Regis.

The Church is dedicated to St. Andrew. The reset late 12th century south doorway to the nave and the early cross-head in the vestry suggest there has been a church on this site since before the end of the 12th century. The tower was built in the 14th century and the nave was partly or possibly wholly rebuilt around the same time, though the south wall was refaced and the north wall rebuilt in the late 17th century. The north chapel, known as the Savage Pew, is also of the late 17th century, dating before 1683. Also, the 17th century saw the south porch added, which was restored during the general restoration of 1870 when the vestry was added and the chancel rebuilt to the design of George Evans. It has been described as over-elaborate and is a good example of our Victorian forefathers getting over enthusiastic about their church restorations. The font is from the early 17th century and the tower houses two bells.

Inside the church there are some interesting memorials including some to the Trenchard and Pickering families and there are heraldic paintings of arms belonging to the Savage and Strode families. The Savages were lords of the manor here in the 17th century. Most unusually there remains the original hour glass with stand; after the reformation the length of sermons was limited to one hour (see photo in gallery.)

In the churchyard there is the tomb of Robert Welsteed, who was Rector here from 1597 until his death in November 1651. The inscription reads:

“Here lies that reverend orthodox divine

Grave Mr Weksteed, aged seventy-nine

He was the painful pastor of this place

Fifty-five years compleate, during which space

None justly could his conversation wound

Nor’s doctrine taint, ‘twas so sincere so sound

Thus having his long thread of life well spunne

Twas cutt, November tenth in fifty-one,

1651.”


Another Rector of this parish, John Morton, went on to become Archbishop of Canterbury (see our article: ‘A Cardinal’s Progress – the Life of John Morton of Stileham’ in the Bloxworth Category.)
 
In 1868 The Reverend Octavius Pickard-Cambridge came to be Rector of Bloxworth in addition to his service to the parish of Winterbourne Tomson. He immediately set about planning the re-building of the chancel as a memorial to his father. He was an expert on spiders and is reputed to have identified in the county 800 species of these creatures and wrote a book about the Spiders of Dorset. After forty-nine years of ministry at Bloxworth he died in 1917.

Of interest also is Samuel Crane who was born at Bere Regis in 1746. (See our article: ‘Samuel Crane – Farmer Diarist of Bloxworth’ in the Bloxworth Category.)

Bloxworth House was home to the Strode family and is essentially a 17th century building of some note. It is occasionally open to the public. There is a story that says there were originally three bells hanging in the church tower but the tenor bell was damaged and the Squire and the Churchwardens had it removed for repair. However, it seems it was sold for sixteen shillings and converted into a large brewing copper, which was installed in Bloxworth House.

Hutchins says life in this parish was hard. Today, it seems that many who live here work elsewhere and possibly enjoy a less physically demanding life-style than that endured by their forefathers.

Solved! – the Sherborne Horse-Bone Mystery

Philip Grove and Arnoldo Cortesi came from very different backgrounds and had very different destinies. Cortesi would one day become Rome correspondent of the New York Times; Grove however, put on a uniform for the First World War and was killed in action during the Battle of Arras in 1917. Yet as boys in 1911 these two men found themselves fellow pupils and friends at Sherborne School. They also shared a passion for the ancient merely because it was old, including fossils that they discovered they could collect from a disused quarry to the north of the town out of school hours.

One day the boys returned from one of their explorations in the quarry with a fragment of bone they claimed to have found on a pile of rubble at the entrance to a cave since quarried away. Cortesi first showed the bone to some other boys who were not interested, but when he attempted to discard the bone in the dayroom fire an older boy called Ross Jefferson intervened and advised Cortesi to show it to the school’s science master, Robert Elliot Steel, first. Steel, who had himself collected mammoth and woolly rhinoceros bones from the quarry for the school’s geological collection, could see that the ancient looking bone bore the crude engraving of a horses head, and asked Cortesi to supply a statement about how the bone was found.

The school bursar then passed this certificate on to Joseph Fowler, a master, who in turn donated all his papers about the bone to the Smith Woodward Archives at the Natural History Museum in London. The bone itself was sent to the museum’s curator of geology, Arthur Smith Woodward, for examination. In a paper prepared for the Geological Society in 1914 Smith Woodward described the find as “an apparent Palaeolithic engraving of a hog-maned Mongolian horse”, and at a subsequent meeting his opinion remained unchallenged by members.

The next development in the saga came in 1924 when William Sollas, Professor of Geology at Oxford, wrote a paper in which he expressed the opinion that, to date, finds from known Palaeolithic sites in England lacked evidence of early artwork. Woodward considered that the semi-fossilised condition of the bone proved its Palaeolithic authenticity because such a condition would have been impossible for a modern forger to replicate. Any attempt to do so, he thought, would have resulted in flaking.

Woodward contacted Arnoldo Cortesi, by then writing for the New York Times
in Rome, for an assurance that the find was genuine, since he thought that Sollas suspected that Cortesi had forged the artefact. However, after Grove had been killed at Arras, his mother and brother affirmed that Phillip was adamant the Sherborne “Palaeolithic” horse was genuine.
 
In 1926 Sollas said that his assistant, C J Bayzand, would confirm that the etching on the bone had been copied from the drawing of a horse on a bone found in a cave at Cresswell in Derbyshire without Sollas ever having seen the Sherborne specimen.
 
A group of boys working on the school’s museum collection told Bayzand that the bone was a fake, even claiming that it came from a rubbish tip on the Bristol road.

Woodward did not reply to his charge of forgery, but in a letter to Nature in 1926 Elliot Steel apologised to Bayzand for the hoax the boys in the museum had played on him! He described how the bone had been found and that a group of older boys, jealous of the discovery, concocted and disseminated the forgery story. Sollas never replied to Steel’s letter, but Professor Boyd-Dawkins effectively demolished Sollas’ evidence.

From the 1950’s onwards however, the bone came under much more intense scientific scrutiny and examination. In 1957 Dr Kenneth Oakley conducted a fluorine test, which gave the bone an upper Palaeolithic age. But when was the image of the horse’s head carved onto it?

In 1978 Professor Douglas, who had succeeded Sollas, accused him of neglecting
to notify Woodward that the Sherborne bone was really a fake before Woodward presented his paper to the Geological Society in 1914, in order to discredit him.

Further tests by Dr Anne Sieveking and Dr M Newcomer demonstrated it was possible for the bone to be engraved with a flint, a finding at odds with Smith Woodward’s opinion that it wouldn’t have been possible to inscribe bone without flaking it. In addition, high magnification showed that the image’s etched lines disappeared into fine cracks. This indicated the bone was already degraded before the etching was done. But were the cracks the result of heat or frost? – and when were they formed? Could an artistic Palaeolithic hunter have used an already degraded bone?

It was pointed out that the odds against two boys only ten days at school finding in a large quarry a bone from a horse species long extinct in this country, then engraving a representation of its head on it were so remote as not to merit consideration. DNA analysis however, was considered but thought to be too hit and miss.

If the bone could be identified as coming from the species of horse apparently portrayed on it, then this would be evidence pointing towards a prehistoric age, though this could not prove anything about the age of the image. As this was not possible and as there was some distinction between the muzzle detail of the Sherborne and Cresswell horses, a conclusion of probable forgery was arrived at.

Furthermore, in 1994 high magnification examination of the bone at Cambridge revealed the grooves of the etch-marks to be so fresh that, unless they had been scrubbed clean, they must have been cut in modern times. Radiocarbon dating and chemical analysis did prove the bone to be a mammalian rib – and no older than the 14th century, thus conflicting with the Palaeolithic result from Oakley’s 1957 fluorine test. Evidently the etching was carried out by a modern person using a modern tool.

The probable reconstruction of events is as follows. It was true that Cortesi was a skilled draughtsman who had won a prize for drawing at the school. It was believed therefore, that, with no intent to deceive, he had copied the Cresswell horse onto the bone in the school’s museum, his talent in this regard contributing to its acceptance as genuine. The idea of hoaxing Elliot Steel may have been Ross Jefferson’s, who suggested that the boys should show the bone to Steel. After learning the bone had been sent to the British Museum, the boys decided to confess to Bayzand, but he failed to pass the information on.

Sollas and Bayzand thus dismissed the engraved rib upon the word of two schoolboys without seeing or inspecting the find. So the overall conclusion is that the horse bone was indeed a forgery, and one fooling many scholars and scientists for almost a century.

Incidentally, the school’s museum, around which so much of this drama unfolded, was bombed and gutted during an as yet incomprehensible air raid on Sherborne in 1940, despite being a small country abbey town having no munitions factories, ordnance depots or obvious strategic significance.

Melbury Bubb

The small parish of Melbury Bubb sits on the eastern slope of the wooded Bubb Down in the north west corner of the county, several miles south of Sherborne and  close to the border with Somerset. “Very extensive and beautiful view” is how the Imperial Gazetteer of 1872 describes the area.

 Melbury comes from the Old English ‘maele’ and ‘burh,’ translated this means ‘many coloured fortified place.’ Where the suffix “Bubb” comes from is uncertain; perhaps it is no coincidence that a Saxon named Bubba resided here before the Norman Conquest.

Melbury Bubb Manor House was rebuilt during the 17th century and includes remains from an earlier building; it stands close to the Parish Church of St. Mary in the north-west of the parish.
 
The church is built from local rubble with freestone dressings. The roofs are slate covered. The south tower forms the main entrance to the church and dates from the 15th century. The initials ‘W B’ appear on the tower suggesting a date of 1470-1480 when Walter Bokeler was rector. The rest of the church seems to have been rebuilt about the same time and was rebuilt again in 1854 under the supervision of Withers, the Sherborne architect. Several of the older windows are incorporated; these traces of 15th century glass depict scenes from the life of St. Mary, the parable of the foolish virgins, symbols of the evangelists and the coats of arms of the Maltravers and Warre families.

The Font is remarkable, being a pre-Conquest stone from the 10th or early 11th century. A cylindrical tapering bowl, formerly part of a circular shaft reversed, the face is carved with a continuous design depicting beasts and interlacement. Beasts include a stag (frequent on Celtic crosses), biting a serpent whose coils interlace the feet of the other animals; a tall horse with paws not hooves; a lion with a mane, biting a small dog with its tail between its legs; and a large animal with a mane (probably a wolf) facing the horse. There are two small legged dragons between the larger animals. This whole scene is presented upside-down and suggests there was a standing cross here in Saxon times.

Among the monuments in the churchyard is a stone to Thomas Baker (alias Williams) “Murdered 1694.” Thomas Baker was a farmer who was murdered on 10th of November 1694. Some will have us believe that on the anniversary of this horrible event the ghost of Thomas Baker and his horse and cart can be seen in the village travelling along Murderer’s Lane.

Portesham Hellstone

The Hell Stone is an example of a Long Barrow with stone interior; it was the entrance to a Neolithic long barrow burial chamber that was originally covered by a mound of earth and consists of nine upright sarsen stones supporting a single capstone. There are several other long barrows in the vicinity; these were used before the round barrows of which there are about four hundred in the Bride Valley area west of Dorchester.

As the centuries passed the burial chamber collapsed and on the 11th of June 1886 a team of men came from Portland to restore it, incorrectly it seems, and failed to reposition the massive capstone. This was placed in position three years later on the 14th of August 1869 when eight quarry men came and completed the task using screw jacks.

Hutchins in his ‘History and Antiquities of the County of Dorset” says: “The common people call it Hellstone, and have a tradition that the devil flung it from Portland Pike, a north point of that island full in view, as he was diverting himself at quoits.” The opening of the barrow faces towards Portland. Hellstone is a local variant of the Old English ‘Heelstone’  or the Saxon word ‘Helian’  meaning to cover or conceal and refers to the capstone. The name has nothing to do with the Devil or his domain.

We have placed a photograph of the Hellstone in the photo area.

Winterborne Stickland

Winterborne Stickland, together with the closely associated Winterborne Houghton, are two of the settlements occupying a chalkland valley on the edge of Blackmoor Vale between Blandford and Milton Abbas. The forename Winterborne refers to a seasonal spring which dries up in summer; Stickland, means “the dweller at the steep path” (from the old English sticol or stickel, meaning steep.) It is likely that the name refers to the Chalky Path, an ancient trackway leading up the hill from the village.

Pevsner records the survival of about 12 prehistoric round barrow burials in the two parishes, indicating human activity, at least for funerary purposes, was taking place from at least the early second millennium BC. But in the centuries following the Norman Conquest the village was peripheral to the estate of Milton Abbey, and grew and prospered as “Winterborn Stikelline” under the influence of the Abbey up until the dissolution.

After the church, the oldest building to survive in the village today is Quarlestone Farm. This farm is thought to have been most likely established as a grant of land by William I, though it is first mentioned as being held by William Quarel in 1232. Later it became the home of the Skinner family, Thomas Skinner being interred in the church. The farmhouse is L-shaped with a rendered façade, and the north range incorporates an early hall assigned to the early 15th century.

There are no original window settings in this farmhouse, so the banded walling cannot be original either. The roof of the hall was constructed with arched braces, but these are now concealed by an inserted floor. The 17th century east range and stair projection, are in alternating ashlar and square flint bands. To see the original flint and stone walls the visitor needs to go to the rear of the farmyard. Today the farmhouse is separated from the farm and its outbuildings.

The parish church of St. Mary’s is mainly 13th century, with a late 15th to early 16th century tower and later re-orderings and alterations carried out in the 18th century. The vicarage was built in brick with flint bands in 1685; a further wing was added in 1768 and further additions were made to the building in the 19th century. Above the main door the coat of arms of the vicar incumbent at the time is displayed. (See our feature about St. Mary’s in the Winterborne Stickland Category.)

Stickland had a brewery, which survived as such until the 1890’s, when it became The Malt House, originally a range of three cottages later converted into a private home. The brewery made use of the pure water of the Winterborne stream, which rises on Bulbarrow, and was formerly run by Hall and Woodhouse before that business moved its operations to Blandford. During the conversion of the Malt House a pair of shoes made for a small child was discovered in an attic, sparking an intriguing mystery with possibly sinister undertones as to who the shoes belonged to and how they came to be there.

Two other important public buildings in the village are the Crown Inn and the village pub, The Shire Horse. Although it has traditionally been an isolated, self-contained community, Stickland has enjoyed good services and supplies, including a store and a good Post Office.

Consequently, the villagers have rarely had to travel as far as Blandford for their provisions. Until about the 1920’s a drainage gully ran down the west side of the village’s North Street.

The village had grown up with a mixture of building types and ages, with vernacular thatched cottages interspersed with more modern housing including some bungalows. Three roads converge at the village green, where the base of an old cross survives. There are also two prominent old lime trees. The northernmost of these trees stands near the church and a cluster of several thatched cottages; more cottages built in courses of red brick and flint stand near the southern lime tree. During the 19th century some Victorian villas were added to the housing stock.

But early photographs reveal that many houses have since been demolished. For instance, next to St. Mary’s there stood a white single-storey building (known as the Terrace) believed to have been the centre of a milling industry. The post office, originally occupying Corner Cottage, was re-located in 1906.

A school to accommodate 130 pupils was opened in 1861, and two Methodist chapels, a Wesleyan and a Primitive, where also established here. However, Whitchurch Chapel was demolished in 1973, and a cottage in The Hollow and two other cottages were demolished in the 1950’s. A serious fire in 1955 destroyed the Church View Stores and a pair of cottages.

In 1896 Mr & Mrs Henry Hambro of Milton Abbey visited the village and gave each household a joint of beef. The memory of this family and the philanthropic gesture behind this unusual event is commemorated in the Pamela Hambro Hall, opened in 1934. Part of the Milton Abbey estate was sold by auction at Blandford Corn Exchange in 1932.

One interesting addition of the 20th century commemorating the local industries is a new village sign set up on the green where the three roads meet. The sign unveiled by the sculptress Elizabeth Frink in 1988, is the work of local craftsmen and portrays brewing, smithing, spinning, button making and working the land.

Stickland suffered in the agricultural depression of the 1870’s, when there was a decline in the population, partly due to northward migration in search of factory work. Indeed the 1881 census returns for Chorley in Lancashire showed that 12 people in that parish working in the cotton mills had come from Stickland. As recently as 1991 that year’s national census recorded a village population of 540, of which 51% were of retirement age or over.

One interesting tradition of Stickland in particular is an extended family with scions or offshoots which has adopted the main name of the village; for example the present parish priest of Quedgeley near Gloucester is only a first generation descendant of a man from Stickland who migrated to South Wales.

Thorncombe: The Consecration of St. Mary’s Church in 1867

Tuesday, October 15th 1867 was to be an important day for the parishioners of Thorncombe. Walter Hamilton, The Bishop of Salisbury, was coming to consecrate their new church but the day also brought torrential rain, which was to hinder proceedings. The weather being so bad the attendance of clergy and gentry was far less than would otherwise have been the case; though, that said, there was a sizeable gathering to greet The Bishop, who had to wait in his carriage for half-an-hour because the Chancellor never arrived. It was decided that Archdeacon Sanctuary should deputise.

Eventually, proceedings got underway and Psalm 24 was sung in procession and the Consecration service began. Then it was the turn of the churchyard to be consecrated and this required the Bishop and clergy to perambulate the ground; in the circumstances not a very pleasant undertaking.

Ankle deep in mud, the planks provided, having sunk into the mire, the party set off managing to keep themselves upright despite the muddy clay and slush. The laity was not quite so adept and one lady fell, face down into the muddy ground, while another left her galoshes in the mud and those who had been able to keep their balance emerged will full boots. Their reward for their perseverance was a fine lunch laid out in a tent that had been erected in the churchyard.

The new church was built at a cost of £4,000 using much of the rubble from the former church, which had been demolished eighteen months earlier. The foundation stone for the new church had been laid on April 26th 1866 by Margaret Bragge, the widow of Colonel Bragge of Sadborow House.

 (For more about the old church and the parish see our article ‘Thorncombe’ in that category.)

Prideaux Family at Forde Abbey

Saviour of Forde Abbey

In the century following the dissolution of the monasteries Forde Abbey was the property of distant owners. For decades the building was neglected and allowed to deteriorate; the Abbey Church was lost and four centuries of improvements by the monks disappeared along with much of the stone and fabric, which was looted.

In 1649 Sir Henry Rosewell sold the Abbey and estate to Edmund Prideaux, Member of Parliament for Lyme Regis, a seat he held until his death. Prideaux took his degree as Master of Arts at Cambridge University. His chief field of study was the law, something he was later to become very eminent in. He was a member of the Long Parliament and was Solicitor-General in 1648. A member of the prevailing party of the day, he did not join his colleagues in attacking the life of the Sovereign and he avoided taking any part in the King’s trial.

In 1649 he was appointed Attorney-General to the Lord Protector and remained in that office until his death. He was a commissioner of the Great Seal and practised within the Bar as King’s Counsel. Prideaux was a very wealthy individual, as besides his lucrative legal practice from 1644 to 1653 he gained great profit from his involvement with the postal service. Oliver Cromwell made Prideaux a Baronet on the 13th of August 1658; the Lord Protector died three weeks later, on the 3rd of September 1658.

Perhaps because it was the property of Mr Attorney-General Prideaux, Forde Abbey was saved from the vandalism suffered by many country mansions during the Civil Wars. Having bought Forde Abbey he spent enormous sums of money improving it. He employed the services of Inigo Jones, who was at that time attempting to introduce the Grecian style of architecture into this country. He did not live to see his designs for Forde Abbey completed, for he died in 1654, whilst work on the house was not finished until 1658.
 
Edmund Prideaux was born in September 1601 at Netherton, Devon. He was the second surviving son of Sir Edmund Prideaux (1555-1629), being descended from an old family originally from Prideaux Castle in Cornwall. Edmund Prideaux’s first wife was Jane Collins and shortly after her death in 1629 he married Margaret Ivery of Cothay in Somerset. He died on the 8th of August 1659 and was succeeded by his only son, also Edmund, who had married Amy Fraunceis of Combe Florey in Somerset in 1655 (Cromwell’s titles were not accepted after the restoration.)
 
                                           The Price of a Life: Innocent or Guilty

Edmund Prideaux was a well-educated man; for some time his teacher was Bishop Tillotson, later Archbishop of Canterbury. Edmund’s contemporaries referred to him as “the walking encyclopaedia.”

In view of the high profile his father had during Cromwell’s rule, we should not be surprised there was no place for him in government after the restoration. He appears to have lived quietly at Ford Abbey.
 
Towards the end of 1680 the Duke of Monmouth visited Forde Abbey during a tour of the West Country, where he was treated by Edmund Prideaux to a very splendid supper and given a bed for the night. This hospitality was to return to haunt Edmund, cost him great expense and nearly his life.

In 1681 Edmund Prideaux was elected one of the Members of Parliament for Taunton. We learn from a note in his own handwriting that on the 16th of July 1683 his home was searched for arms. Two muskets, one brass blunderbuss and four cases of pistols were removed.
 
The year of 1685 was memorable, particularly in the West Country after Monmouth landed at Lyme Regis. Edmund Prideaux, it is said, remained at Forde Abbey. News reached London that during this time Prideaux received a visit at night from a group of eight men led by Thomas Dare of Taunton; they were given horses and arms. Furthermore it was reported that one of the party, Malachi Mallock, drank the health of Monmouth.

Mallock was later arrested and appeared before Judge Jeffreys at Dorchester on September 10th and was condemned to death and should have been hanged at Bridport on September 12th. Mallock bargained for his life by offering to give evidence that would implicate Edmund Prideaux in the Rebellion.

We know from a private pocket-book kept  by Edmund Prideaux that on the 19th of June 1685 he was taken prisoner by a messenger, Mr Sayell; the entertainment of Monmouth in 1680 had caught up with him. He was released by Habeas Corpus on the 12th of July, only to be arrested again on September 14th following Mallock’s evidence against him, and transferred to the Tower.

Judge Jeffreys was of the opinion that some Royalists had been ruined by the Rebellion and should be compensated from sums raised by the sale of prisoners, something Jeffrey’s did not engage in himself, with one exception: Edmund Prideaux.

Prideaux was in custody and instead of being brought to trial he was given to Jeffreys to agree his own terms with the prisoner, who had not been charged with any offence. Jeffreys insisted on a huge bribe to obtain a pardon, which was granted on the 20th of March 1686. Jeffreys used the £15,000 he got from Prideaux as part of the price he paid for his Leicester estates.

After the accession of William III, Edmund Prideaux presented a petition to Parliament for leave to bring a Bill to charge the estates of Lord Chancellor Jefferys with the restitution of the £15,000 he paid for his pardon. Following fierce opposition from Lord Chief Justice Pollexfen, trustee for the children and creditors of Jeffreys, the Bill was not carried.

His fortune greatly diminished, Edmund Prideaux lived out his days peacefully at Forde Abbey. His only son, Fraunceis Prideaux, died at Oxford aged 19. He had three daughters: Amy, who died at a young age; Elizabeth, who was married to John Speke of Somerset, and Margaret, who was married in 1690 to her cousin, Francis Gwyn of Glamorgan in Wales.

Edmund Prideaux died intestate on October 16th 1702 and, his wife having renounced, letters of administration were granted to Margaret Gwyn, his sole surviving daughter and heiress.

Melbury Osmond

The father of the bride did not approve of his daughter marrying the young man from Affpuddle but Betty Swetman went ahead anyway and married George Hand at St Osmond’s church, two days after Christmas 1804.  Mr. Swetman’s fears proved unfounded and the couple appear to have enjoyed a happy marriage and had several children. 

In 1835 their fifth child, Jemima, on returning from a stay in London, went to live near Stinsford, a parish a short distance from Dorchester, where she met a builder who she married on the 22nd of December 1839 at St. Osmond’s church. There is a framed copy of their marriage certificate displayed in the church. The following year the couple’s first child was born; he was given his father’s name and was destined to become Dorset’s most famous son: Thomas Hardy.

This unspoilt and picturesque village is approached along a weaving lane, lined with thatched stone cottages, many of which have stood here since the 17th century. The lane continues to a shallow ford where there is a small footbridge over the water.

The parish church dedicated to St. Osmond stands in the village. The west tower was built in the 15th century but, except for the tower-arch and some walling above it, this and the whole of the rest of the church was rebuilt in 1745, the cost born by Mrs Susanna Strangeways Horner. The chancel was rebuilt during restoration works in 1888 by Sir Arthur Bloomfield, in the style of the 13th century.  The work was commissioned by the 5th Earl of Ilchester.  Arthur Mee relates that in the 19th century “a font thought to be Norman was found built into the wall and is now in its place again, looking almost too new to be true.” The tower was home to five bells; in 1954 two of the bells were recast and the remaining three were retuned. The following year a new bell chamber was constructed and in 1967 a new treble bell was added.

In addition to the church the RCHM found a dozen 17th century cottages and several other buildings worthy of mention. In its history there was an extensive trade in plated buckles and horn buttons; dowlas (a course cloth) was manufactured here. Melbury comes from the Old English ‘maele’ and ‘burh,’ translated this means ‘many coloured fortified place,’ the suffix a reference to the dedication of the church.
 
In his novels and short stories Thomas Hardy called this village, “Kings Hintock and Little Hintock”.